Silicon Valley Minute

New head of energy / E-mobility Andreas Ertel is now new head of energy/E-mobility of Dornier Consulting GmbH in Berlin. He assumes this position ad interim by Christian Guhl, who left the company in mutual agreement with the Board of management. “We are pleased, that we could win an experienced consultant for this challenging position with Mr. Ertel,” so Dr. Jurgen Koffler, CEO of Dornier Consulting. Andreas Ertel knows the issues around the turn of the energy; He is consultant in the field of energy and electric mobility for almost 10 years. Since early 2013 he is Chief Consultant in challenging energy projects for the Dornier Consulting.

About Dornier Consulting GmbH with our three hundred employees, we advise in projects of national importance and high public interest in the metropolitan area & mobility solutions. The volume of project supervised by us is EUR 20 billion. Our main customers include World Bank, KfW, EU, Governments, authorities, airport corporate properties, Infrastructure operators, automotive and aerospace industry and energy suppliers. We assist our clients from concept to implementation. With technological expertise and extensive knowledge of the industry, we lead our client’s projects to sustainable success. The business areas include the areas Telematics System integration Mobility/traffic & transport Water & environment Energy / E-mobility and Infrastructure & buildings

One of the issues most frequently raised in cases of separation or divorce, or just anytime that the couple may want to change the regime by which is governed their family economy from one of marital property to another; It is to determine severance labour (for example) rating, how marital property, either as proprietary. When it takes place the liquidation of the conjugal society has arise an inventory of all assets, rights and obligations available to the family economy, determine which of them would have a positive regime and, in connection therewith, raise its division between the two. Theory collection by the economic regime of marriage regulations establishes that once held marriages in regime of community property, and unless otherwise agreed, all rents that could obtain spouses be considered as community property, corresponding without distinction and equally to both spouses. And that kind of allowances lump sum came perfectly in this definition, it would be undisputed, in principle, its consideration as a positive good. Learn more about this with Rod Brooks. No_obstante the issue supports different nuances: to) imagine it were compensation for dismissal of a work in which the person would have been developing their work from earlier dates when they married. In this case, as the courts have been understanding, would consider two sections:-a first tranche of compensation attributable to the stage that employee came to work without even conjugal society have been formed, and that would be considered proprietary in nature. -A second section, when it had already been established, that would be considered positive if anything.

(b) if the payment of compensation had constant place marriage, would be considered that good is positive, whereas if it occurs subsequently to the dissolution of such positive society, shall be regarded as proprietary. (c) on the other hand, if the compensation I would have corresponded, for example, to an amputation, occupational disease or other circumstance directly derived from your work, this will be proprietary, understand that you have a clearly personal, individual and non-transferable nature. In short, is not exempt from certain complexity matter, and although initially it can be said that, generally, this type of amounts be considered marital, will need to understand the nuances of each individual case, because variations that give place to a completely opposite result may occur. Begona basin Alcaine original author and source of the article